Hi, On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 09:39:57PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > >>>>On 03/21/2013 06:23 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>>>>PHY layer no longer returns NULL, we must switch from > >>>>>IS_ERR_OR_NULL() to IS_ERR(). > >>>>The patches that I'll put into my topic branch are not yet > >>>>complete; Venu first posted them a couple days back and there are > >>>>a number of issues that will require a repost. > >>>is your topic branch ready now ? I'm about to close my tree for > >>>v3.10, we already have -rc5 tagged and I want to leave my pull > >>>request cooking in next for a while. > >>Unfortunately not. > >> > >>Venu's patch series had a bunch of runtime bugs, and I also found out > >>that the DT binding /still/ wasn't fully thought out. As such, this > >>series won't be applied for 3.10. > >> > >>I still have a vague (and probably naive) hope that the updated > >>bindings and DT file modifications can be applied on the Tegra side in > >>the next few days so that for 3.11 there won't be any inter-tree > >>dependencies. However, we'll just have to wait and see whether Venu > >>has found the bugs yet. > >alright, so I'll go ahead and close my 'next' branch for v3.10, > >tomorrow. Leave it in linux-next for a few days and send my pull request > >to Greg by Friday. > > > >Let me just check if there are any other important features to go in > >v3.10 which won't cause big regressions. > > I was going to post some cleanup/features for > drivers/usb/phy/rcar-phy.c today > or tomorrow. So am I already late for 3.10? if it comes today (before midnight in UTC +2, so in less than 3 hours), I can still apply. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
