Hello.
On 04/02/2013 07:44 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi again,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:19:51AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 03/21/2013 06:23 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
PHY layer no longer returns NULL, we must switch from
IS_ERR_OR_NULL() to IS_ERR().
The patches that I'll put into my topic branch are not yet
complete; Venu first posted them a couple days back and there are
a number of issues that will require a repost.
is your topic branch ready now ? I'm about to close my tree for
v3.10, we already have -rc5 tagged and I want to leave my pull
request cooking in next for a while.
Unfortunately not.
Venu's patch series had a bunch of runtime bugs, and I also found out
that the DT binding /still/ wasn't fully thought out. As such, this
series won't be applied for 3.10.
I still have a vague (and probably naive) hope that the updated
bindings and DT file modifications can be applied on the Tegra side in
the next few days so that for 3.11 there won't be any inter-tree
dependencies. However, we'll just have to wait and see whether Venu
has found the bugs yet.
alright, so I'll go ahead and close my 'next' branch for v3.10,
tomorrow. Leave it in linux-next for a few days and send my pull request
to Greg by Friday.
Let me just check if there are any other important features to go in
v3.10 which won't cause big regressions.
I was going to post some cleanup/features for
drivers/usb/phy/rcar-phy.c today
or tomorrow. So am I already late for 3.10?
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
