On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 23:47 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 03/06/2013 05:40 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > Which is why I showed the whole thing in a single patch. > > No worries if it's simply to increase the patch count... > > I'm not sure what showed refers to? The changes I posted with the suggestion https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/6/468 > I guess if I squashed /everything/ into a single commit (i.e. the change > to the Tegra section in MAINTAINERS too) then there wouldn't be any > bisect issues. I really don't care about patch count. The reason for >1 > patch is that there's often push-back if doing logically separate things > (adding N: feature, modifying a MAINTAINERS entry to use it, removing > part of K: feature) in a single patch... Not from me anyway. I think it's a single logical change and it's trivial too. No worries whatever happens. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html