On 03/06/2013 05:40 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 17:34 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 03/06/2013 05:30 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>> On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 17:29 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> This reverts most of eb90d08 "get_maintainer: allow keywords to match >>>> filenames"; all except the parts that are required to implement the new >>>> N: entry type. >>> >>> Just combine patches 1 and 3 into a single patch. >> >> That would break bisectability; using MAINTAINERS after applying a >> squashed 1+3 but without patch 2 applied would not operate as desired. > > <smile> > > Which is why I showed the whole thing in a single patch. > No worries if it's simply to increase the patch count... I'm not sure what showed refers to? I guess if I squashed /everything/ into a single commit (i.e. the change to the Tegra section in MAINTAINERS too) then there wouldn't be any bisect issues. I really don't care about patch count. The reason for >1 patch is that there's often push-back if doing logically separate things (adding N: feature, modifying a MAINTAINERS entry to use it, removing part of K: feature) in a single patch... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
