On Sunday 17 February 2013 04:08 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: [...] > > "supplied nodes" sounds confusing (doesn't reflect direction), IMO. I'd > rather call it power-supply,supplied-to = <&some_battery>; > > But... I'm recalling there was a similar discussion not that long ago, and > Arnd came up with the idea that supplied-to is not fully in spirit of DT, > and proposed his view of proper bindings. Please find the discussion here: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/14/104 'supplied-to or supplied nodes' is specific to "power-supply core and battery managed devices/drivers" and not platform specific. Dependent battery drivers interacts/shares power supply events with the help of 'supplied_to' 'num_supplicants' and external_power_changed(...) identifiers which are defined and fixed during driver design, it will be more meaningful to have it internal to drivers instead DT. Ref: ab8500_[fg,btemp,charger].c, abx500_chargalg.c and arch/arm/boot/dts/dbx5x0.dtsi Thanks, Rajanikanth [...] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
