On 08/05/2012 08:27 PM, Alex Courbot wrote: > On 08/04/2012 11:12 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 10:15:46AM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: >>> On Fri 03 Aug 2012 03:11:12 AM JST, Mark Brown wrote: >> >>>> I missed some of the earlier bits of the thread here but why can't >>>> we do >>>> device based lookups? ... > I think we only have two choices for this: > > 1) Stick to the scheme where resources are declared at the device level, > such as they can be referenced by name in the sub-nodes (basically what > I did in this patch): > > backlight { > compatible = "pwm-backlight"; > ... > backlight-supply = <&backlight_reg>; > > power-on-sequence { > step@0 { > regulator = "backlight"; > enable; > }; > > This would translate by a get_regulator(dev, "backlight") in the code > which would be properly resolved. Yes, upon reflection, that scheme does make sense. I withdraw the comments I made re: whether it'd be better to just stick the phandles into the steps. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html