On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 05:00:13PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 07:45 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >Oh I see. That's a little confusing. Why not just reference the relevant
> >resources directly in each step; something more like:
> >
> > gpio@1 {
> > action = "enable-gpio";
> > gpio = <&gpio 1 0>;
> > };
> >
> >I guess that might make parsing/building a little harder, since you'd
> >have to detect when you'd already done gpio_request() on a given GPIO
> >and not repeat it or something like that, but to me this makes the DT a
> >lot easier to comprehend.
>
> I tried to move towards having the phandles directly in the
> sequences themselves - that reminded me why I did not do that in the
> first place. Let's say we have a sequence like this (reg property
> omitted on purpose):
>
> power-on-sequence {
> step@0 {
> regulator = <&backlight_reg>;
> enable;
> };
> step@1 {
> delay = <10000>;
> };
> step@2 {
> pwm = <&pwm 2 5000000>;
> enable;
> };
> step@3 {
> gpio = <&gpio 28 0>;
> enable;
> };
> };
>
> The problem is, how do we turn these phandles into the resource of
> interest. The type of the resource can be infered by the name of the
> property. The hard part is resolving the resource from the phandle -
> it seems like the API just does not allow to do this. GPIO has
> of_get_named_gpio, but AFAIK there are no equivalent for regulator
> consumer and PWM: the only way to use the DT with them is through
> get_regulator and get_pwm which work at the device level.
>
> Or is there a way that I overlooked?
No, you are right. Perhaps we should add exported functions that do the
equivalent of of_pwm_request() or the regulator_dev_lookup() and
of_get_regulator() pair.
Thierry
Attachment:
pgp1mojYyU4AH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
