On Tuesday 10 July 2012 07:14 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:29:06PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Looked tps6586x-regulator driver and it has the platform data which
is regulator_init_data.
So for adding the vin-supply similar to what we have in fixed or
tps6591x regulator to pass through the desc.supply_name, we are not
having option here in platform data which can work for DT and non-DT
case.
So if still want to have the DT and non-DT case similar, we can add
one tps6586x_regulator_platform_data as
The supply names are not supposed to be conditional (I realise they are
for your current DT patch, I let that in because I just want to see an
end to all this DT stuff).
Sorry, I did not get it fully. I had two patches, one for fixed one and
other for tps65910. On which patch, you are seeing issue and which part
of code?
I like to fix it if it does not conform the DT or your expectation or
any future enhancement which you are planning.
Little bit more details will help so that I will not repeat the same and
fix it in my future patches.
Thanks,
Laxman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
