On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:54:21PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > I had detailed discussion with Mark on this support and as per him > (based on my understanding), the input to different regulator is > from the pin of the chips and so the name should be the > <pin-name>-supply which should be part of chip-dt binding, not to > the particular rail. More specifically, all the supplies for a device (including those that happen to be inputs for regulators) should be specified in exactly the same fashion. This makes the binding more regular and means that users can just go through the schematic adding the mappings without worrying about what what the supply happens to be.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
