On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 10:24:06PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 06/08/2012 09:06 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > If we're going to do this we need to update all the existing DT bindings > > for drivers that use single node regulators like this. Please also > > change the name used for the property to regulator-compatible to make it > > clear that the idea is the same as normal compatible properties. > I'm not sure of the logic behind naming the property > "regulator-compatible"; the standard compatible property identifies that > the node is of a particular type/class, whereas the regulator-id in the > example Laxman quoted would indicate the specific identity/object. Those > seem like different things. They're both doing the same thing - up until you get the second register compatible device a compatible binding is referencing a specific thing too. It's just saying "handle this like an X". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
