On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 12:52:03AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > So is it fine to go on the above binding? > In this case we need to find the match_regulator based on > regulator-id rather than by name. I guess. I'm not enthusiastic about it (some way of using the key/value nature of DT as a hash would be much nicer) but it seems that the combination of DT and the existing code for it can't really give us more. If we're going to do this we need to update all the existing DT bindings for drivers that use single node regulators like this. Please also change the name used for the property to regulator-compatible to make it clear that the idea is the same as normal compatible properties.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
