On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/16/2012 11:15 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
>> Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote @ Wed, 16 May 2012 17:49:27 +0200:
>>
>>> On 05/16/2012 06:44 AM, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
>>>> Use a more plain english name.
>>>
>>> It's probably too late taking this cosmetic change for 3.5.
>>>
>>> There is also an "emc" node that probably should be renamed to
>>> memory-controller too. In that case, since there will be two
>>> memory-controller nodes, you'll need to add the unit address
>>> ("@xxxxxxxx") back on the end of both the node names.
>>>
>>> Can I get a patch series that does all that and updates the binding
>>> documentation for both MC and EMC? Probably separate patches for MC and EMC.
>>
>> Sure. How should we deal with "emc" for emc-table in seaboard?
>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-seaboard.dts:337: emc {
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-seaboard.dts:338: emc-table@190000 {
>
> I'd be inclined to leave that as-is. Olof, any objections?
Yeah, it's the term normally used for the tables so it makes sense to keep it.
-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
