On 05/16/2012 11:15 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote @ Wed, 16 May 2012 17:49:27 +0200:
>
>> On 05/16/2012 06:44 AM, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
>>> Use a more plain english name.
>>
>> It's probably too late taking this cosmetic change for 3.5.
>>
>> There is also an "emc" node that probably should be renamed to
>> memory-controller too. In that case, since there will be two
>> memory-controller nodes, you'll need to add the unit address
>> ("@xxxxxxxx") back on the end of both the node names.
>>
>> Can I get a patch series that does all that and updates the binding
>> documentation for both MC and EMC? Probably separate patches for MC and EMC.
>
> Sure. How should we deal with "emc" for emc-table in seaboard?
> arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-seaboard.dts:337: emc {
> arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-seaboard.dts:338: emc-table@190000 {
I'd be inclined to leave that as-is. Olof, any objections?
By the way, be sure to base your patch on the very latest Tegra tree or
linux-next; I did a lot of .dts cleanup in the last couple days.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
