On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 15:12 +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > On Wednesday 25 April 2012 03:03 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 14:31 +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > >> I had a communication with Russell on another change thread and > >> understand that some more work need to be done in virt_chan to support > >> cyclic one. > >> > >> I want to have the cyclic dma support in my driver so I want to go on > >> following steps: > >> 1. I will post the patch for tegra dma which will not use the virt_dma > >> so that my driver will be independent of Russel's change. > > which driver? A new driver for cyclic support only or on top of > > Russell's changes? > > I am referring the Nvidia Tegra's APB dma driver. This will be > completely new driver based on dmaengine. We have old dma driver under > mach-tegra/dma.c which has tegra specific apis. Want to move this driver > to generic dmaengine based api. Okay, lets review the new patchset then :-) -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
