On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 14:31 +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > > I had a communication with Russell on another change thread and > understand that some more work need to be done in virt_chan to support > cyclic one. > > I want to have the cyclic dma support in my driver so I want to go on > following steps: > 1. I will post the patch for tegra dma which will not use the virt_dma > so that my driver will be independent of Russel's change. which driver? A new driver for cyclic support only or on top of Russell's changes? > 2. Once the tegra dma is part of tree, I can move all my dma client to > use the dmaengine based driver and remove old style dma. > 3. Till that time Russell's will have already virt_dma support for > cyclic one and so I will change tegra_dma.c to use virt_dma. > > > Let me know your opinion so that I can plan my patch/change > accordingly. -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
