On Monday 16 April 2012, Thierry Reding wrote: > Seems like this issue is resolved, but something else came up. In the !OF > builds, of_pwm_request() no longer builds because of_property_match_string() > and of_parse_phandle_with_args() have no dummies for !OF. I've posted patches > for these on Friday and they need to go in before the PWM subsystem. I could > also revert the IS_ENABLED() parts and go back to a #ifdef CONFIG_OF but I'd > rather not. > Agreed, using IS_ENABLED from C code is much nicer than #ifdef because we can be sure that all code actually builds. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
