Re: [PATCH v6 17/17] pwm: Take over maintainership of the PWM subsystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 12 April 2012, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >   * Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 10 April 2012, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > I'm taking over the maintainership of the PWM subsystem. This commit
> > > > also adds the URLs to the gitorious project and repository as well as
> > > > any missing files related to the PWM subsystem.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > Note: I guess this patch in particular could use some Acked-by, maybe from
> > > > Arnd and Sascha so that people will know this happens with their blessing.
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > As far as I can tell the series is in pretty good shape. I've integrated
> > Shawn's latest comments and I think we could get this into 3.5. Does it make
> > sense to take the PWM tree through Linux next before having it pulled into
> > mainline during the next merge window?
> 
> Yes, that's the way to go. Just ask Stephen Rothwell to include it right
> away if you are sufficiently happy with the contents and believe that they
> don't break stuff.

I just saw that there's been some discussion to remove IS_ENABLED() and
replace it by something else. So maybe I should wait another day or two
until those changes settle in next.

Thierry

Attachment: pgpSSfx9JZeuP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux