On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 11:20:46PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 04:30:21PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: ... > > The "bad" > > thing is that it'll make the "pwm-names" property mandatory if more than a > > single PWM is requested. > > > You do not have to make it mandatory, but anyone requesting any pwm > other than the first on in "pwms" list should fail. > I should have put it this way. If a client device does not have "pwm-names" property in its node, it should fail when requesting pwm with a name. And if no name is given, the first pwm device in the "pwms" list could just be returned. -- Regards, Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
