On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> + static struct pwm_lookup board_pwm_lookup[] = {
> + PWM_LOOKUP("tegra-pwm", 0, "pwm-backlight"),
> + };
The clock and regulator APIs namespace the consumers by struct device -
might this not be sensible here? pwm_get() does already take the device
as an argument. It'd feel safer, and for example there's plenty of
phones out there with two backlit displays...
> + * pwm_get() - look up and request a PWM device
> + * @dev: device for PWM consumer
> + * @provider: name of provider PWM chip
> + * @index: per-chip index of PWM to request
The documentation is out of sync with the signature.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
