Olof Johansson wrote at Thursday, December 22, 2011 5:18 PM: > Device tree bindings for the EMC tables on tegra. ... > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra/emc.txt ... > +Embedded Memory Controller ram-code table ... > +- name : Should be emc-tables > +- nvidia,ram-code : the binary representation of the ram-code board strappings > + for which this node (and children) are valid. ... > +Embedded Memory Controller configuration table ... > +- name : Should be emc-table > +- compatible : Should contain "nvidia,tegra20-emc-table". > +- reg : either an opaque enumerator to tell different tables apart, or ... One more thought: For consistency, should the "emc-tables" node also require a compatible value? I suppose the existence of an "nvidia,ram-code" property is quite likely to be indication enough that the node is compatible, but I wonder if we shouldn't require and check an explicit compatible value at this level too? -- nvpublic -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
