On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 01:11:33AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Olof Johansson wrote at Thursday, December 22, 2011 5:18 PM: > >>> Timings for the T25 version of seaboard, only one memory manufacturer > >>> and timing table (two speeds). > >> > >> There exist Seaboards with Tegra20 rather than Tegra25. Should we: > >> * Rename tegra-seaboard.dts to tegra-seaboard.dtsi > >> * Create tegra-seaboard-t20.dts and tegra-seaboard-t25.dts which include > >> tegra-seaboard.dtsi, and add the EMC tables to the Tegra25 version only? > > > > Honestly, T20 seaboards are deprecated around here, we've been > > replacing all we have with T25 models and keeping T20 support around > > is a pain. I'd rather just ignore them if we can. > > It's fun how board prototype problems sping up in several similar > companies :-) > > When I am confronted with similar problems I have taken the stance: > > Q: is the board available outside my company esp to community > people and other hackers who will be pissed if I screw it up? > > If the answer is no, and there is no risk that anyone will blame you > for it on this mailinglist - delete it. Then handle the people that > yell at you internally and ask them to bring their board to the > junkpile. Yeah, it's normally the way to do these things, with a transition while the supply of newer hardware is still limited. It's a little more complicated by the fact that I personally don't have control over what Nvidia chooses to do internally. :) -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html