On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Olof Johansson wrote at Thursday, December 22, 2011 5:18 PM: >>> Timings for the T25 version of seaboard, only one memory manufacturer >>> and timing table (two speeds). >> >> There exist Seaboards with Tegra20 rather than Tegra25. Should we: >> * Rename tegra-seaboard.dts to tegra-seaboard.dtsi >> * Create tegra-seaboard-t20.dts and tegra-seaboard-t25.dts which include >> tegra-seaboard.dtsi, and add the EMC tables to the Tegra25 version only? > > Honestly, T20 seaboards are deprecated around here, we've been > replacing all we have with T25 models and keeping T20 support around > is a pain. I'd rather just ignore them if we can. It's fun how board prototype problems sping up in several similar companies :-) When I am confronted with similar problems I have taken the stance: Q: is the board available outside my company esp to community people and other hackers who will be pissed if I screw it up? If the answer is no, and there is no risk that anyone will blame you for it on this mailinglist - delete it. Then handle the people that yell at you internally and ask them to bring their board to the junkpile. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
