RE: [PATCH v1 0/3] Tegra30 clockframework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Peter De Schrijver wrote at Monday, January 02, 2012 8:18 AM:
> This patchset introduces the tegra30 clockframework. Clocks which require
> voltage scaling are not included in this version. The implementation doesn't
> use the generic clock code yet. It's the intention to move to it, once the
> semantics are fully clarified.

I'm not particularly familiar with Tegra's clocks, but nothing really
stood out as wrong with this patch on a quick look-through. It'd be great
if someone like Colin could look this over.

A couple thoughts below. You've probably thought about some of these
already, but I just wanted to make sure:-)

* Are we following the common clock stuff so we can move over once it's
ready?

* Are Tegra20 and Tegra30 so different we can't re-use any of the code
in tegra2_clocks.c for Tegra30?

* The device names in the peripheral clock table might benefit from a
review to make sure they match tegra2_clocks.c for the drivers we've
actually upstreamed at least.

-- 
nvpublic

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux