2011/6/3 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 10:04:45AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> Right now we can't do dynamic registration for on-chip devices in a
>> lot of cases because we don't have the infrastructure to hook up the
>> associated struct clks.
>
> I've been wondering about this, and I don't see it as a blocking problem
> as you seem to be.
>
> I assume platform devices have stable names when they're created from
> the device tree? ÂIf yes, there's no problem having the DT start to
> describe the SoC specific devices _today_ - all that the clk API using
> clkdev requires is a stable device name.
when i write the following nodes in dts,
uart0: uart@0xb0060000 {
compatible = "sirf,uart";
...
}
uart1: uart@0xb0050000 {
compatible = "sirf,uart";
...
}
uart2: uart@0xb0070000 {
compatible = "sirf,uart";
...
}
then create these platform devices by of_platform_xxx things, i get
some platform devices like the below.
b0060000.uart
b0050000.uart
b0070000.uart
so these are the "stable names" you are talking about? or something else?
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
