On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 05:07:02PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> 2011/6/2 Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> 2011/5/28 John Bonesio <bones@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >>> This patch makes it so the top level audio card is initialized from the device
> >>> tree. This is just the first step getting the audio complex of devices
> >>> iniialized from device tree nodes.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: John Bonesio<bones@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-harmony.dts | 4 +++
> >>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c | 3 ++
> >>> sound/soc/tegra/harmony.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >>> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-harmony.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-harmony.dts
> >>> index 05521a5..217a7f0 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-harmony.dts
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-harmony.dts
> >>> @@ -53,6 +53,10 @@
> >>> clock-frequency = <400000>;
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> + harmony_audio: audio_card {
> >>> + compatible = "nvidia,harmony-audio";
> >>> + };
> >>> +
> >>> serial@70006300 {
> >>> status = "ok";
> >>> clock-frequency = < 216000000 >;
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c
> >>> index c498e84..a569ad9 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c
> >>> @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ static struct platform_device *tegra250_devices[] __initdata = {
> >>> &tegra_i2c_device2,
> >>> &tegra_i2c_device3,
> >>> &tegra_i2c_device4,
> >>> + &tegra_i2s_device1,
> >>> + &tegra_das_device,
> >>> + &tegra_pcm_device,
> >>
> >> i am thinking whether platform_device should be created by
> >> of_platform_device_create after scanning device tree, but not by
> >> hard-code? looks like the two patches are only trying to let device
> >> tree deliver gpio to drivers?
> >
> > Can you please restate your question? I don't think I understand what
> > you are trying to ask.
>
> i mean we don't need to have this platform device registerred by the
> old way here. we may get it by matching information in dts and delete
> all platform_device and related codes in arch/arm. For example:
Ah, I see what you mean. Yes, it is ultimately the goal to register
all the device from data in the device tree, but we're taking things
one step at a time. For this series, it is expedient to register the
on-chip devices, and to move to dynamic registration later.
Right now we can't do dynamic registration for on-chip devices in a
lot of cases because we don't have the infrastructure to hook up the
associated struct clks.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
