Olof Johansson wrote at Wednesday, February 23, 2011 2:52 PM: > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ... > > OK, so just so I'm clear: > > > > Patches 1..4 are all going in as-is. > > > > I should re-post patch 5 once the merge window is open, having rebased > > it on Olof's i2c registration changes, and > > s/GPIO_WM8903/HARMONY_GPIO_WM8903/. Or, should I repost as soon as Olof > > has updated his branch with the I2C changes, and you'll just hold off > > applying it until the merge window? > > How big would the delta be between a patch that would apply (and work) > with current .38-rc wm8903 platform data? If it's just the GPIO base, > we can merge everything but that and just do the small change late in > the merge window. Once the I2C tree is merged, the only thing needed to make my patch apply immediately is to remove the gpio_base assignment. I can split that into a separate patch and post a series if that helps. > And yeah, please repost after the i2c stuff is in my branch, I'll > stage it accordingly. Great, thanks. -- nvpublic -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
