Olof Johansson wrote at Wednesday, February 23, 2011 2:25 PM: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Colin Cross <ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Stephen, > >> > >> Since this depends on i2c, and registers one of the adapters to do it, > >> we should just get the adapters registered separately (all of them) > >> before this. I was holding off that part of board code since the i2c > >> driver went up that maintainer path instead, but if Colin pulls it > >> into tegra for-next, then I'll go ahead with those peices as well. > > > > I'll merge the i2c-tegra branch into for-next (assuming Ben doesn't > > object to it), and you can put all the i2c devices in your pull > > request. That way we can get everything except this patch into the > > first pull request to Linus, and just put this patch into a second > > pull request once the ASoC branch is merged. > > Sure, that works. I'll stage the i2c changes tonight. OK, so just so I'm clear: Patches 1..4 are all going in as-is. I should re-post patch 5 once the merge window is open, having rebased it on Olof's i2c registration changes, and s/GPIO_WM8903/HARMONY_GPIO_WM8903/. Or, should I repost as soon as Olof has updated his branch with the I2C changes, and you'll just hold off applying it until the merge window? Thanks. -- nvpublic -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html