> That makes sense - the IRQ handler should be changed to report an alarm > instead of an update. The IRQ handler already only supports alarms and does not take 1/sec update into account. > Probably the enable disable can be entirely > managed via the registers as well? Agree. Instead of toggling the rtc irq the actual bits in the RTC_CONFIG register should be toggled. Also alarm_irq_enable callback should be implemented to control the alarm enable bit in the hardware. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
