On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 07:16:28PM +0530, Varun Wadekar wrote: > Actually the update_irq_enable api was incorrectly implemented by the > original author since the chip does not have support for the 1/sec > update timer interrupt. The chip only has hardware support for alarms > and supports reading/setting time. support for update_irq_enable needs > to be removed from the code. That makes sense - the IRQ handler should be changed to report an alarm instead of an update. Probably the enable disable can be entirely managed via the registers as well? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
