On 08/26/2013 05:03 PM, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
You mean you prefer the previous version of the patch always builds
tgtd with modular backends ?
If so, that is fine with me. I just thought there was some pushback on
that approach so I did this patch as a compromise.
I didn't see the pushback and so was surprised at this latest revision,
and was hoping whoever had that opinion would join in. But my opinion
is that "bs modules always dynamic" is the right answer; I think you had
it right in the prior version.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Dan Mick <dan.mick@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think this is a bad idea; this will encourage package builders to build a
version which cannot be updated/new backends supplied, which removes a lot
of the advantage of building with .so backends to begin with. Why are we
abandoning dynamic-by-default?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
