2012/12/10 Braun, David <David.Braun@xxxxxxx>:
> By "like today the dummy-LUN0 will automatically be replaced" you mean with your patch - right?
>
> My --force code was very simple - basically a 2 line change. The other changes are just prints. Here's what I did.
David,
It's not as simple as that, as the dummy device mapped to LUN 0 is
also abused to handle SCSI requests sent to LUNs that are not backed
by a device:
int target_cmd_queue(int tid, struct scsi_cmd *cmd)
{
/* ... snip ... */
cmd->dev = device_lookup(target, dev_id);
/* use LUN0 */
if (!cmd->dev)
cmd->dev = list_first_entry(&target->device_list,
struct scsi_lu,
device_siblings);
/* ... snip ... */
/*
* Call struct scsi_lu->cmd_perform() that will either be setup for
* internal or passthrough CDB processing using 2 functions below.
*/
return cmd->dev->cmd_perform(tid, cmd);
}
This is addressed by the patch Boaz is carrying in his tree.
HTH,
Arne
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
