On 12/10/2012 06:28 PM, Braun, David wrote: > That sounds workable. > > What about when the last LUN is deleted? Would you shut down the sockets and disappear? > Yes sure, same thing that is done today on "tgtadm remove target" should be promoted to remove of last LUN. > And like you - my --force fix works for me! But that's not the way to do it. > Actually it is not that bad in my opinion. I have not seen the actual code but for me it kind of makes sense too. Unless code wise it's ugly, I couldn't tell. What if you don't do a --force option at all. What if like today the dummy-LUN0 will automatically be replaced by the first real LUN0 set by tgtadm? that sounds even better but same as your solution. Will you have a bit of time to work on this. Please CC me I'll review and test your code. > What would the "correct" way be? > either way for me apply, I think. It's your call. Thanks Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
