Re: [PATCH] SSC: dont fsync() on each written block. Do one single fsync() when file is closed in FILEMARK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Only got iPad access to email for this week. No real computer to test etc, but patch look sensible..

You can add my ack, or wait for next week when I can test too. 

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 23, 2012, at 18:09, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:49:49 +1100
> ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> So, doing this is fine according to SSC, but we have to indicate that
>> we do this by setting the buffered-mode to 1h in the mode-sense data.
>> I have attached an updated patch that both does the "fsync() on
>> write-filemark" as before but also modifies the mode-sense we send
>> back from ssc devices to indicate "buffered-mode==1 : we do buffered
>> writes."
> 
> Great, thanks a lot!
> 
> Mark, this patch looks good to you?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Clusters]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux