On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:59:38 +0300 Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks, the pthread-per-target changes were reverted, so it should be > > stable now. tgt had been stable before the changes. Otherwise, vendor > > guys would hit me hard, I guess. :) > > Hi Tomo > > Do you have plans to return this in the future, once debugged and stabilised? I want but probably it would take long. I need to work on the clustering feature now because my company needs it. > For me too, as osd-target. It gave performance boost with multiple targets on > same machine. This is because my target is badly written and does sync handling, > no queue, of every thing. Funny that I did not experience problems with it > during testing, but I'm not running a production system so I might got lucky. > > Please tell me your plans so I know if I'll have to fix my backend, one day, or > can get by with this fix. I don't know when I can rework on this. I would recommend you to fix your issues. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
