Re: tgtd segfault

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/29/2010 05:20 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:30:23 +0200
> Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On 22.07.2010 13:19, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>>
>>>> If you have time, please try the following:
>>>>
>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tomo/tgt.git testing
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It includes the revert patches that I've just sent.
>>>
>>> It is stable, although note that it's only about 24 hours as I run it.
>>>
>>> I'll let you know if it malfunctions over the next days.
>>
>> FYI, it works fine since I started it about a week ago. 1.0.6 
>> malfunctioned after 1-2 days.
> 
> Thanks, the pthread-per-target changes were reverted, so it should be
> stable now. tgt had been stable before the changes. Otherwise, vendor
> guys would hit me hard, I guess. :)

Hi Tomo

Do you have plans to return this in the future, once debugged and stabilised?

For me too, as osd-target. It gave performance boost with multiple targets on
same machine. This is because my target is badly written and does sync handling,
no queue, of every thing. Funny that I did not experience problems with it 
during testing, but I'm not running a production system so I might got lucky.

Please tell me your plans so I know if I'll have to fix my backend, one day, or
can get by with this fix.

Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Clusters]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux