On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:27:37 +0200 Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/26/2009 12:22 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:08:21 +0200 > > Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On 11/26/2009 10:13 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > >>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:42:04 +0200 > >>> Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Lets try and find an acceptable solution. What if we refuse any > >> connections until we have the first LUN configured. I know how to do > >> it in iscsi, is there a way to do it in a general way? > > > > OpenSolaris target implementation requests you to create a target > > *with* a logical unit. It's another hacky solution. > > > > I don't think that we need to change the current way. > > What about a command line option for us users who would like not > to see that tgt-LUN0. Would you accept a command line switch, off > by default. Something like --hide-lun0 ? What I'm against is hacky code for shadow or hidden lun. I prefer to keep the code clean rather than handle poor OSes kindly. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
