On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:08:21 +0200 Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/26/2009 10:13 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:42:04 +0200 > > Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>>> The dummy RAID controller serves 2 purposes: > >>>> (1) commands that are addressed to an inexistent LUN are redirected to it > > > > My purpose is redirecting appropriate commands (INQUIRY, REPORT_LUNS, > > anything else?). I'm lazy so tgt redirects all. I'm happy to accept a > > patch to fix it. > > > > Sure, but it is the same as today, No? If you are care about it, send a patch. It should be just several lines. It's not related much with 'lun0'issue. > > I think that 'shadow lun' is hacky and I don't like to use that trick > > for poor OSes. > > > > The hack is already there today. Only this patch tries not to publish the hack to the outside > world. Huh? Seems that you misunderstand SCSI. > Lets try and find an acceptable solution. What if we refuse any > connections until we have the first LUN configured. I know how to do > it in iscsi, is there a way to do it in a general way? OpenSolaris target implementation requests you to create a target *with* a logical unit. It's another hacky solution. I don't think that we need to change the current way. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
