On 2009-10-06 13:54, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > I'm not sure if `make tarball` is useful. I don't use it so it's not > my problem but I don't want to support something that doesn't work > well. > > For example, `make tarball` creates useless tarball for me: > > fujita@viola:~/git/tgt$ tar tjf tgt-0.9.9.tar.bz2 |head > tgt-0.9.9/GPATH > tgt-0.9.9/GRTAGS > tgt-0.9.9/GSYMS > tgt-0.9.9/GTAGS > tgt-0.9.9/Makefile > tgt-0.9.9/README > tgt-0.9.9/conf/ > tgt-0.9.9/conf/targets.conf Well it turns out that the patch actually fixes that too. It will only roll Makefile, README, conf/, doc/, scripts/ and usr/ into the tarball. > Everyone has other files for other reasons. I don't think that `make > tarball` is a good idea. See above. > You complained that git-archive handles only files in a git tree but > it should not be a problem. You have your own git tree so git-archive > should create a nice tarball for you. But it doesn't work for rolling a tarball that I can then build with rpmbuild -tb, which was the whole point. Florian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
