On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:50:05 +0200 Florian Haas <florian.haas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/06/2009 06:20 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > btw, I'm not sure about my second patch (the port option). > > > > Another option that I thought about is something like the following: > > > > tgtd --iscsi portal=10.1.30.21:3260 > > > > With two portals, > > > > tgtd --iscsi portal=10.1.30.21:3260,portal=10.1.40.3:3260 > > FWIW, I'd much prefer the "portal" syntax. Seems more in line with > conventional iSCSI terminology, too. Yeah, agreed. I'd like to go with this unless someone is against it. > Of course, ideally that would mean that you extend tgtadm too, so > individual targets can be bound to specific portals. :) We would but let's leave it alone until someone who wants it for a sane reason shows up. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
