On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:48:36 +0800
"rae l" <crquan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:34 PM, FUJITA Tomonori
> <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Tomasz told me offline that X.X.X style version is important for some
> >> cases. I'm not sure about it but I have no strong reason against
>
> I think all distributors will more like X.X.X, just like the bug on bugs.gentoo,
I don't think so.
For example, `dpkg --list` gives me:
ii autotools-dev 20060702.1 Update infrastr
ucture for config.{guess,sub}
You can find some other software that uses 'date' style version. At
least, debian seems to handle it.
For me, it's just marketing. Something like 1.0.0 or 2.0.0 gives some
people an idea that it's stable software. Well, it's often wrong.
But as I said already, I'm ok with this. I'll release 0.9 next week
unless someone is against it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
