On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:34 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Tomasz told me offline that X.X.X style version is important for some >> cases. I'm not sure about it but I have no strong reason against I think all distributors will more like X.X.X, just like the bug on bugs.gentoo, >> releasing X.X.X (I'm just too lazy to do that). >> >> So anyone is against releasing stgt-1.0.0 now? We should use a beta >> version something like 0.9.0 yet? > > On second thought, it migth be better to implement Persistent Reserve > before 1.0.0. I suggest something like systemtap: It has formal releases after some important features implemented: http://sourceware.org/systemtap/ftp/releases/ and has a preview snapshot tarball every week, http://sourceware.org/systemtap/ftp/snapshots/ its upstream SCM is also git, the author use `git tag` to tag a formal x.y.z release, and `git archive` to generate the tarball, it's very convenient. stgt is very similar like it, so I suggest you release a formal 1.0.0 after an important feature implemented, Of course, you can now release it as 0.9.0 And really you can do a simple roadmap, just attach each important feature to a major version, as VTL to 1.0, yyy to 1.1, zzz to 1.2, Distributors will be happier about this type of upstream. -- Denis Cheng Linux Application Developer "One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code." - Ken Thompson. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
