On 25/03/15 10:18AM, Christian Brauner wrote: > > But I'll wait for an ACK from the filesystem developers before doing it > > as having filesystem code in drivers/staging/ feels odd, and they kind > > of need to know what's going on here for when they change api stuff. > > Sorry, I don't want new filesystems going through the generic staging > tree. Next week during LSFMM we can discuss a filesystem specific > staging tree that is directly maintained as part of fs so it's tightly > integrated. We're going to talk about two new filesystems anyway. No problem! I understand. I just wanted to get the ball rolling and start the conversation about this process. I am eager to hear back. Thanks, Ethan > > Thanks! > Christian
