On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 05:11:32PM +0300, Alexandra Diupina wrote:
> media_entity_pads_init() will not return 0 only if the
> 2nd parameter >= MEDIA_ENTITY_MAX_PADS (512), but 1 is
> passed, so checking the return value is redundant
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> Fixes: ad85094b293e ("Revert "media: staging: atomisp: Remove driver"")
> Signed-off-by: Alexandra Diupina <adiupina@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c | 4 +---
> drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-mt9m114.c | 6 +-----
> drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c | 2 --
> drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/ov5693/atomisp-ov5693.c | 2 --
> 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c
> index 9fa390fbc5f3..f10931a03285 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c
> @@ -840,9 +840,7 @@ static int gc2235_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> dev->ctrl_handler.lock = &dev->input_lock;
> dev->sd.ctrl_handler = &dev->ctrl_handler;
>
> - ret = media_entity_pads_init(&dev->sd.entity, 1, &dev->pad);
> - if (ret)
> - gc2235_remove(client);
Not related to your patch but why doesn't this error path return an
error? Can that be right?
> + media_entity_pads_init(&dev->sd.entity, 1, &dev->pad);
>
> return atomisp_register_i2c_module(&dev->sd, gcpdev, RAW_CAMERA);
regards,
dan carpenter
