On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 10:03:19AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 12:55:11AM -0300, Alexon Oliveira wrote:
> > Adhere to Linux kernel coding style.
> >
> > Reported by checkpatch:
> >
> > CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> >
> > #132: FILE: drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_bridge.h:132
> > #135: FILE: drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_bridge.h:135
> > #139: FILE: drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_bridge.h:139
> > #142: FILE: drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_bridge.h:142
> > #144: FILE: drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_bridge.h:144
> > #146: FILE: drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_bridge.h:146
> > #148: FILE: drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_bridge.h:148
> > #152: FILE: drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_bridge.h:152
> > #163: FILE: drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_bridge.h:163
> > #173: FILE: drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_bridge.h:173
> > #175: FILE: drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_bridge.h:175
>
> We don't need all of these lines.
Hi Greg, I hope you're good and these messages find you well.
ACK. I thought it would be good to explain what I changed.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexon Oliveira <alexondunkan@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Please don't indent your signed-off-by line, that should be to the left.
>
ACK. I didn't indent. This was the output of "git format-patch" I copied and pasted. Next time I'll remove the indentation manually.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_bridge.h b/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_bridge.h
> > index 11df0a5e7f7b..a0d7a8db239d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_bridge.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_bridge.h
> > @@ -128,28 +128,21 @@ struct vme_bridge {
> > struct mutex irq_mtx;
> >
> > /* Slave Functions */
> > - int (*slave_get)(struct vme_slave_resource *, int *,
> > - unsigned long long *, unsigned long long *, dma_addr_t *,
> > - u32 *, u32 *);
> > - int (*slave_set)(struct vme_slave_resource *, int, unsigned long long,
> > - unsigned long long, dma_addr_t, u32, u32);
> > + int (*slave_get)(struct vme_slave_resource *, int *, unsigned long long *,
> > + unsigned long long *, dma_addr_t *, u32 *, u32 *);
> > + int (*slave_set)(struct vme_slave_resource *, int, unsigned long long, unsigned long long, dma_addr_t, u32, u32);
>
> Did you run your patch through checkpatch.pl after making this change?
Yes, I did it. No more checks about "Alignment should match open parenthesis".
> I think you just added more warnings...
I only focused to solve the checks related to the message above. Nevertheless, there are still other warnings and checks reported by checkpath.pl non-related to this patch (i.e. not caused by this patch) that need to be fixed, but I intend to help to fix them afterwards in a different patch, so I don't send patches with too many changes at once.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
I appreciate your feedback and if there's any other question or request, pleaset let me know.
Thank you.
Alexon Oliveira
