Re: [PATCH 28/57] media: Add ovxxxx_16bit_addr_reg_helpers.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 01:05:52PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 12:53:43PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 12:47:55PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 12:29:19PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 12:21:15PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 06:11:12PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

...

> > > > > I took a look at this some time ago, too, and current regmap API is a poor
> > > > > fit for CCI devices. CCI works on top of e.g. both I²C and I3C so something
> > > > > on top of regmap is a better approach indeed.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm confused, is regmap a poor fit, or a better approach ?
> > > 
> > > I'm proposing having something on top of regmap, but not changing regmap
> > > itself.
> > 
> > I don't understand why we can't change regmap? regmap has a facility called
> > regmap bus which we can provide specifically for these types of devices. What's
> > wrong to see it done?
> 
> How would that work ?

If I'm not mistaken, you may introduce something like regmal CCI and then

	regmap_init_cci();


	regmap_read()/regmap_write()
	regmap_update_bits()
	regmap_bulk_*()

at your service without changing a bit in the drivers (they will use plain
regmap APIs instead of custom ones).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Development]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux