Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] staging: r8188eu: add error handling of rtw_read32

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/26/21 1:22 PM, David Laight wrote:
From: Pavel Skripkin
Sent: 26 August 2021 10:28

On 8/26/21 12:22 PM, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 08:51:23 +0000
> David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
>> ...
>> > -static u32 usb_read32(struct intf_hdl *pintfhdl, u32 addr)
>> > +static int usb_read32(struct intf_hdl *pintfhdl, u32 addr, u32
>> > *data) {
>> >  	u8 requesttype;
>> >  	u16 wvalue;
>> >  	u16 len;
>> > -	__le32 data;
>> > +	int res;
>> > +	__le32 tmp;
>> > +
>> > +	if (WARN_ON(unlikely(!data)))
>> > +		return -EINVAL;
>> >
>>
>> Kill the NULL check - it is a silly coding error.
>> An OOPS is just as easy to debug.
>>
>
>
> I don't think that one single driver should kill the whole system. It's
> 100% an error, but kernel can recover from it (for example disconnect
> the driver, since it's broken).
>
>
> AFIAK, Greg and Linus do not like BUG_ONs in recoverable state...
> Correct me, if I am wrong
>
Oops, I thought about BUG_ON() instead of WARN_ON(), sorry for
confusion. My point is "we should not let the box boom".


There is no point checking for NULL that just can't happen.
In this case all the callers will pass the address of a local.
There really is no point checking.


We not always read in local variable, there are few places, where we read into passed buffer.



With regards,
Pavel Skripkin




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Development]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux