On 8/25/21 1:06 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 12:55:37PM +0300, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
The main problem, that no one knows who is the "old". Greg can take patches
in any order he wants
Patches are always taken in first come first serve.
Ok, but if pending patch needs new version, then it will be taken at the
end?
Here is the situation we have:
I have the patch series based on old function behavior, it was
posted first
Then Fabio posted refactoring of the function and it changes
return values.
Both series are pending right now and made on top of staging-next
branch. Who needs to rebase? I think, applying these series as-is can
broke the driver, since error handling will be broken
With regards,
Pavel Skripkin
