On 8/25/21 12:48 PM, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
On Wednesday, August 25, 2021 10:22:16 AM CEST Pavel Skripkin wrote:
On 8/25/21 7:35 AM, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> Dear Pavel,
>
> Please note that if and when my patch "Use usb_control_msg_recv / send () in
> usbctrl_vendorreq ()" will be merged, "if (res! = len)" will always evaluate 'true'
> and usb_read16 () will always return -EIO even if usbctrl_vendorreq () succeeds.
>
Yep, thank you, but it depends on which series will go in first :)
There is a chance, that you will need to clean up this part, if mine
will be merged before yours
Ha-ha ... I know that beautiful rule: whoever breaks must fix!
However there should be another rule which says that
the old (me) takes precedence over the young (you) :-)
The main problem, that no one knows who is the "old". Greg can take
patches in any order he wants, because they are naturally independent :)
We only can say smth like "this one depends on this one" as reply to
patch to inform Greg about the situation.
Seriously, thank you so much for your help and the "Reviewed by"
tag on my work.
You too :) We are doing same job here for the good of community and
kernel itself
With regards,
Pavel Skripkin
