On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 10:46:23AM +0100, Beatriz Martins de Carvalho wrote:
>
> Em 07/04/21 09:34, Greg KH escreveu:
> > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:16:44AM +0100, Beatriz Martins de Carvalho wrote:
> > > Em 07/04/21 06:37, Greg KH escreveu:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 09:00:07PM +0100, Beatriz Martins de Carvalho wrote:
> > > > > Em 06/04/21 20:36, Greg KH escreveu:
> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:34:09PM +0100, Beatriz Martins de Carvalho wrote:
> > > > > > > Cleans up check of "Lines should not end with a '('"
> > > > > > > with argument present in next line in file emxx_udc.c
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Beatriz Martins de Carvalho <martinsdecarvalhobeatriz@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c | 11 ++++-------
> > > > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > > > Why is this a [RESEND] ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What happened to the first version?
> > > > > Sorry, I didn't receive your review, and in kernelnewbies tutorial, they say
> > > > > if not receive a response, may have missed the patch, so I resent it.
> > > > Do you have a pointer to your previous patch in the lore.kernel.org
> > > > archives anywhere? I can't seem to find it.
> > >
> > > I found this, it's what is you need?
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20210401195457.24512-1-martinsdecarvalhobeatriz@xxxxxxxxx/
> > Ah, yes, I saw Julia's review and assumed you would fix up your patch
> > based on her comments. Please do not ignore review comments, it makes
> > everyone's lives harder.
> Sorry, I didn't fix up my patch based on her comments, because to do this
> was
> to revert all my patch or will break a code line if I remaining within 80
> characters. How the code line still stays between 85 or 90 I assumed that
> was
> ok, so I was waiting for your review. Now I saw that I should send this
> answer
> to her. What should I do with the patch?
If you do not know, ask the reviewer what they mean by their review
comments.
thanks,
greg k-h
