RE: [RFC PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: Add bindings for describing concatinated MTD devices

["Mahapatra, Amit Kumar" <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xxxxxxx>]

Hello Krzysztof

> > This approach was suggested by Rob [1] during a discussion on Miquel's
> > initial approach [2] to extend the MTD-CONCAT driver to support
> > stacked memories.
> > Define each flash node separately with its respective partitions, and
> > add a 'concat-parts' binding to link the partitions of the two flash
> > nodes that need to be concatenated.
> 
> I understand this was not sent to proper addresses for review because it is a RFC.

Yes, that’s correct.

Regards,
Amit

> It's fine then.
> 
> If this was not the intention and this should be reviewed (and tested, although I
> assume you tested these patches first), then please read the standard form bellow:
> 
> <form letter>
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people and lists to
> CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older kernel, gives you outdated
> entries. Therefore please be sure you base your patches on recent Linux kernel.
> 
> Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of people, so fix your
> workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some ancient tree (don't, instead use
> mainline) or work on fork of kernel (don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and
> everything should be fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you
> added new patches to the patchset.
> 
> You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be tested by
> automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be a waste of time.
> 
> Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
> </form letter>
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof